Australian politics

Betting Market Friday

Pollytics - March 12, 2010 - 9:22am

There was some interesting behaviour this week in the markets with Centerbet, IASbet and Sportingbet all having a nap, while Betfair had a small move towards Labor and Sportsbet went berko!

weeklychangemar12

The “Any Other Party” on Sportsbet (read “Coalition”) moved from $3.80 to a whopping $4.70, while Labor pulled in to $1.18, down from its $1.25 last Friday.

Sportsbet has opened up the range of implied probabilities for a Labor victory to a substantially large 7.6% across the 5 agencies, with Centerbet having Labor on a 72.3% win probability and Sportsbet coming in at the other end of the spectrum on a 79.9% implied probability. Read more »

Essential Report – National Curriculum Edition

Pollytics - March 9, 2010 - 5:05pm

This week’s Essential Report comes in with the primaries running 43 (up 1)/ 40 (steady) to Labor, washing out into a two party preferred of 54/46 the same way – a one point gain to Labor since last week. The Greens and the broad “Others” are steady on 9 a piece. This comes from a rolling two week sample of 1889, giving us an MoE that maxes out around the 2.3% mark.

Additional questions this week covered which level of government the public believes should be responsible for an array of issues, perceptions of gender wage differentials in the workplace, why people vote the way they do at both State and Fed elections, as well as public opinion on Rudd’s national curriculum.

These additional questions ran off a sample of 1129, giving us an MoE that maxes out around the 2.9% mark.

Do you think the following services should be mainly the responsibility of the Federal Government or State Governments? Read more »

Are confident consumers good for the government?

Pollytics - March 9, 2010 - 12:06pm

This is an expanded version of something I wrote for the Crikey daily mail last week.

Does increasing consumer confidence boost the government vote? Orthodox wisdom would have us “yes” – good consumers are good government voters. If people are happy with their economic lot, if they’re happy with their economic expectations about the future, then they will – so the theory goes – reward the government for overseeing a fortuitous economic environment that boosts prosperity and their material well being.

However, the actual answer is somewhat different. Once upon a time there was indeed a strong relationship between consumer confidence and government political stocks -back in the boom/bust of the late 80’s and into the 1990’s recession period – and that probably explains why this myth is so enduring.

But a myth it generally is – at least in terms of the strength of the relationship – as we shall see. Read more »

Nielsen Part 1 – The Vote Estimates

Pollytics - March 8, 2010 - 8:02am

Today’s Nielsen via the Fairfax press has the Coalition up 1 on the primaries and Labor steady to come in at 42/42, washing out into a two party preferred of 53/47 to Labor – a one point gain to the Coalition since last month. The Greens are on 9 (down 1) while the broad “Others” are on 5 (down 2). This comes from a sample of 1400, giving us an MoE that maxes out around the 2.6% mark. You can see the full demographic tables here.

We’re going to do something a bit different today and look at approval ratings, preferred PM and win expectations by party vote. To start with, approval ratings for both Rudd and Abbott.

ruddapproval1 Read more »

Rudd checks the nation’s pulse

Grog's Gamut - March 3, 2010 - 8:35pm

The announcement today by Kevin Rudd at the National Press Club was a big one. It took the “political narrative” by the scruff of the neck and yanked it well and truly to that of the Government’s choosing. If the Opposition opens up Question Time on Monday with questions about insulation they will look like they are lacking policy on either health or education. They will have to go after Rudd (and Roxon and Gillard). Anything else is to abandon the playing field to the ALP in the two areas that will go a big way to determining the election.  Read more »

On the QT: All mothers are sacred – especially rich ones

Grog's Gamut - March 9, 2010 - 8:37pm

Today’s Question Time was dominated by Tony Abbott’s announcement yesterday introducing a policy (of sorts) to introduce a maternity leave scheme to be funded by a 1.7% tax on businesses earning over $5 million a year.

It’s one of those policies which that part of me which used to be a callow unthinking young lefty who thought all big business was evil would have rather liked. Unfortunately the part of me that grew up, went to uni, did an economics degree, learned that the government doesn’t grow a big money tree out the back of Parliament House, and who likes well thought out public policy thinks the Abbott maternity leave scheme is complete bollocks. 389739-100309-nicho-650x366 Read more »

Stumbling Clowns

Hyperidian Bannerman - March 9, 2010 - 2:58pm

Freebie advice today for Tony "judge me on what I say now & not what I've said before" Abbott from Peter Costello's former political advisor, Niki Savva. She's right too. Abbott is not a good speaker, despite how convicted his tone of voice. He gives the impression of someone who's always caught on the hop, not done his research, announcing new initiatives because they just came to him in a flash of inspiration. Not a good look for a pollie. Not good at all.

This is a flaw in a great many of our current crop of politicians. The inability to at least appear lucid and confident about what they have to say, and then say it effectively. There wouldn't be one Jim Killen or Fred Daly in either federal Parliament, and certainly no Whitlams or Menzies. The closest I've seen to a really cogent speaker would be Lindsay Tanner. I've not yet seen him on his feet without something pointed and authoritative to say, and deliver it without stumbling, uhm-ing and ahh-ing. Not a statesman by any means, but at least not painful to listen to. Read more »

Nielsen Part 2 – Health Plan and Issue Management

Pollytics - March 8, 2010 - 12:21pm

Continuing on from Part 1 where we had a look at the vote estimates and win expectations, we now move on to the additional questions that were asked on greater federal government involvement in the hospital system and a question on which party is best to handle a number of issues.

The hospital question and its results – including cross-tabs – came in like this:

hospitalplan1 Read more »

Tas & SA elections: 2 weeks to go

Bartlett's Blog - March 5, 2010 - 3:49am
There are only two weeks to go until state elections in both Tasmania and South Australia.  Whilst there has always been a strong prospect that Tasmania will produce a result where no single party will win a majority in their right, some are starting to suggest the same might occur in South Australia.

Read more »

Political scientist Dean Jaensch has said http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2010/s2836089.htm he thinks “it’s a strong possibility that we could be facing a hung Parliament”. While the Liberals need to win a mammoth 10 seats to gain a majority in the 47 seat Parliament, Labor only needs to lose five seats to lose majority control.  This would “leave the choice of who’s going to be the government in the hands of three independents, all of whom I would suggest will be re-elected.”

Newspoll: 52-48 (or some things have changed a bit, some things haven’t)

Grog's Gamut - March 2, 2010 - 8:20pm

Today out came the Newspoll that revealed a couple of interesting things. Firstly it showed a 1% increase in both the ALP’s and Liberal Party’s primary votes, but because of a 3% decline in the Green’s primary, the Two Party Preferred changed from 53-47 to 52-48 – essentially no change at all. But the really interesting thing was how little attention this Newspoll received in the media. Two months ago a 52-48 poll would have seemed like a seismic shift in the political world. Now it is reported as a bit of a ho hum. It makes me suspect that 52-54 is here to stay for the ALP. Read more »